Your agent can call ax1om · scoring is live over MCP, free tier included.Start freeAlready have an account?

Model readouts explain every warning in business terms, and agree on provenance

ImprovementMCPModels

A third-party agent evaluating the MCP surface reached buyer-facing answers carrying terms like recency sentinels, matched cutoffs and created-date resolution. Each was accurate, and each needed an expert to act on. To the person deciding whether to trust a model, a warning they cannot read is the same as no warning.

Every readout now carries warnings_explained beside the unchanged warnings list: for each warning, the family, the technical term, what it means for your numbers and what you would do about it, across 25 warning families. Warnings the translator does not know are counted in untranslated_warning_count rather than dropped. Stored feature-stability warnings and true-loss notes, which the readouts used to omit, are included through the same collector, so warning counts and approval caveats are complete.

One more disagreement is gone. recommend_model labelled a model’s data provenance unresolved on every call while list_models resolved it correctly, because the recommender never received the connection list. Both tools now read provenance through one resolver and cannot give two answers about the same model.